Premium
Commentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti & Jefferson (2018)
Author(s) -
Corsico Paolo,
Singh Ilina
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
child and adolescent mental health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.912
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1475-3588
pISSN - 1475-357X
DOI - 10.1111/camh.12292
Subject(s) - illusion , intervention (counseling) , action (physics) , psychosis , psychology , service (business) , clinical practice , psychotherapist , medicine , psychiatry , nursing , cognitive psychology , business , physics , quantum mechanics , marketing
In this response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018), we discuss the action‐guidance problem of moral attributes and the risk of superiority illusion in early intervention for psychosis. First, we suggest that guidance documents are not devoid of behavioural recommendations and goals for service provision, though these are not linked to the ethical dimensions of good practice embedded in the documents. Second, we acknowledge the risk of superiority illusion; we suggest that this risk may be reduced if the ethical and clinical goals of early intervention are presented as interrelated and measurable.