z-logo
Premium
Does high labour mobility always promote trade liberalization?
Author(s) -
Kishishita Daiki
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
canadian journal of economics/revue canadienne d'économique
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.773
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1540-5982
pISSN - 0008-4085
DOI - 10.1111/caje.12402
Subject(s) - liberalization , free trade , economics , obstacle , democracy , international economics , principal (computer security) , labour economics , market economy , political science , politics , computer science , law , operating system
Abstract Labour immobility (high adjustment cost) has been regarded as a major obstacle to trade liberalization and it has been argued that higher labour mobility promotes trade liberalization. However, this is not the case when we take into account conflicts of interest between politicians and voters that are inevitable in representative democracy. I construct a simple two‐period model including both elections and sectoral adjustment. Then I show that the non‐monotonic relationship between labour mobility and the equilibrium degree of trade liberalization exists due to the principal–agent relationship. In representative democracy, higher labour mobility prevents trade liberalization in some cases.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here