Premium
The poverty of GIS theory: Continuing the debates around the political economy of GISystems
Author(s) -
Thatcher Jim E.,
Imaoka Laura Beltz
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the canadian geographer / le géographe canadien
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.35
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1541-0064
pISSN - 0008-3658
DOI - 10.1111/cag.12437
Subject(s) - geographic information system , function (biology) , field (mathematics) , politics , political geography , poverty , development geography , geography , economic geography , regional science , political science , human geography , social science , sociology , economy , historical geography , cartography , economics , law , mathematics , evolutionary biology , pure mathematics , biology
Over the past several decades, GISystems and GIScience have become established and valorized within the field of geography and geographic education. With the recent explosion in daily use of devices producing spatial data, such as smartphones, has come a renewed call to broaden the purview of Critical GIS beyond the desktop and towards these new systems of capitalist accumulation. In this viewpoint, we argue that any re‐examination of the role of Critical GIS must also consider the political economy of geography and geographic education in which GISystems are used for research and taught. We explicate three registers at which GISystems function within geography: that of the individual educator, that of the GIS user, and that of the military‐industrial complex in which GISystems were and are developed.