Premium
Different receptor mechanisms underlying phytocannabinoid‐ versus synthetic cannabinoid‐induced tetrad effects: Opposite roles of CB 1 /CB 2 versus GPR55 receptors
Author(s) -
Wang XiaoFei,
Galaj Ewa,
Bi GuoHua,
Zhang Cindy,
He Yi,
Zhan Jia,
Bauman Michael H.,
Gardner Eliot L.,
Xi ZhengXiong
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1111/bph.14958
Subject(s) - catalepsy , tetrad , cannabinoid , receptor , cannabinoid receptor , pharmacology , chemistry , tetrahydrocannabinol , cannabinoid receptor type 2 , biology , endocrinology , biochemistry , antagonist , dopamine , haloperidol , genetics
Background and Purpose Cannabis or cannabinoids produce characteristic tetrad effects—analgesia, hypothermia, catalepsy and suppressed locomotion, which are believed to be mediated by the activation of cannabinoid CB 1 receptors. Given recent findings of CB 2 and GPR55 receptors in the brain, we examined whether these receptors are also involved in cannabinoid action. Experimental Approach We compared Δ 9 ‐tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ 9 ‐THC)‐, WIN55212‐2‐, or XLR11‐induced tetrad effects between wild‐type (WT) and each genotype of CB 1 ‐, CB 2 ‐ or GPR55‐knockout (KO) mice and then observed the effects of antagonists of these receptors on these tetrad effects in WT mice. Key Results Systemic administration of Δ 9 ‐THC, WIN55212‐2 or XLR11 produced dose‐dependent tetrad effects in WT mice. Genetic deletion or pharmacological blockade of CB 1 receptors abolished the tetrad effects produced by all three cannabinoids. Unexpectedly, genetic deletion of CB 2 receptor abolished analgesia and catalepsy produced by Δ 9 ‐THC or WIN55212‐2, but not by XLR11. Microinjections of Δ 9 ‐THC into the lateral ventricles also produced tetrad effects in WT, but not in CB 1 ‐KO mice. CB 2 ‐KO mice displayed a reduction in intraventricular Δ 9 ‐THC‐induced analgesia and catalepsy. In contrast to CB 1 and CB 2 receptors, genetic deletion of GPR55 receptors caused enhanced responses to Δ 9 ‐THC or WIN55212‐2. Antagonisim of CB 1 , CB 2 or GPR55 receptors produced alterations similar to those observed in each genotype mouse line. Conclusions and Implications These findings suggest that in addition to CB 1 , both CB 2 and GPR55 receptors are also involved in some pharmacological effects produced by cannabinoids. CB 1 /CB 2 , in contrast to GPR55, receptors appears to play opposite roles in cannabinoid action.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom