Premium
Second M 3 muscarinic receptor binding site contributes to bronchoprotection by tiotropium
Author(s) -
Kistemaker Loes E.M.,
Elzinga Carolina R.S.,
Tautermann Christofer S.,
Pieper Michael P.,
Seeliger Daniel,
Alikhil Suraya,
Schmidt Martina,
Meurs Herman,
Gosens Reinoud
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1111/bph.14707
Subject(s) - allosteric regulation , muscarinic acetylcholine receptor , pharmacology , chemistry , atropine , binding site , receptor , agonist , medicine , biochemistry
Background and Purpose The bronchodilator tiotropium binds not only to its main binding site on the M 3 muscarinic receptor but also to an allosteric site. Here, we have investigated the functional relevance of this allosteric binding and the potential contribution of this behaviour to interactions with long‐acting β‐adrenoceptor agonists, as combination therapy with anticholinergic agents and β‐adrenoceptor agonists improves lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Experimental Approach ACh, tiotropium, and atropine binding to M 3 receptors were modelled using molecular dynamics simulations. Contractions of bovine and human tracheal smooth muscle strips were studied. Key Results Molecular dynamics simulation revealed extracellular vestibule binding of tiotropium, and not atropine, to M 3 receptors as a secondary low affinity binding site, preventing ACh entry into the orthosteric binding pocket. This resulted in a low (allosteric binding) and high (orthosteric binding) functional affinity of tiotropium in protecting against methacholine‐induced contractions of airway smooth muscle, which was not observed for atropine and glycopyrrolate. Moreover, antagonism by tiotropium was insurmountable in nature. This behaviour facilitated functional interactions of tiotropium with the β‐agonist olodaterol, which synergistically enhanced bronchoprotective effects of tiotropium. This was not seen for glycopyrrolate and olodaterol or indacaterol but was mimicked by the interaction of tiotropium and forskolin, indicating no direct β‐adrenoceptor–M 3 receptor crosstalk in this effect. Conclusions and Implications We propose that tiotropium has two binding sites at the M 3 receptor that prevent ACh action, which, together with slow dissociation kinetics, may contribute to insurmountable antagonism and enhanced functional interactions with β‐adrenoceptor agonists.