z-logo
Premium
Volume scanning electron microscopy for imaging biological ultrastructure
Author(s) -
Titze Benjamin,
Genoud Christel
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
biology of the cell
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1768-322X
pISSN - 0248-4900
DOI - 10.1111/boc.201600024
Subject(s) - volume (thermodynamics) , scanning electron microscope , resolution (logic) , biological specimen , biomedical engineering , workflow , computer science , microscopy , ultrastructure , focused ion beam , materials science , artificial intelligence , biology , optics , physics , anatomy , ion , quantum mechanics , database , composite material , medicine
Electron microscopy (EM) has been a key imaging method to investigate biological ultrastructure for over six decades. In recent years, novel volume EM techniques have significantly advanced nanometre‐scale imaging of cells and tissues in three dimensions. Previously, this had depended on the slow and error‐prone manual tasks of cutting and handling large numbers of sections, and imaging them one‐by‐one with transmission EM. Now, automated volume imaging methods mostly based on scanning EM (SEM) allow faster and more reliable acquisition of serial images through tissue volumes and achieve higher z ‐resolution. Various software tools have been developed to manipulate the acquired image stacks and facilitate quantitative analysis. Here, we introduce three volume SEM methods: serial block‐face electron microscopy (SBEM), focused ion beam SEM (FIB‐SEM) and automated tape‐collecting ultramicrotome SEM (ATUM‐SEM). We discuss and compare their capabilities, provide an overview of the full volume SEM workflow for obtaining 3D datasets and showcase different applications for biological research.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here