Premium
MicroRNA signature in various cell types of mouse spermatogenesis: Evidence for stage‐specifically expressed miRNA‐221, ‐203 and ‐34b‐5p mediated spermatogenesis regulation
Author(s) -
Smorag Lukasz,
Zheng Ying,
Nolte Jessica,
Zechner Ulrich,
Engel Wolfgang,
Pantakani Dasaradha Venkata Krishna
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
biology of the cell
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1768-322X
pISSN - 0248-4900
DOI - 10.1111/boc.201200014
Subject(s) - biology , spermatogenesis , microrna , signature (topology) , microbiology and biotechnology , cell , computational biology , genetics , gene , endocrinology , geometry , mathematics
Background information Recently, it became apparent that microRNAs (miRNAs) can regulate gene expression post‐transcriptionally. Despite the advances in identifying the testis‐expressed miRNAs and their role in spermatogenesis, only few data are available showing the spatiotemporal expression of miRNAs during this process. Results To understand how different miRNAs can regulate germ cells differentiation, we generated a transgenic mouse model and purified pure populations of premeiotic (PrM) cells and primary spermatocytes (meiotic cells). We also established spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) culture using relatively simple and robust culture conditions. Comparison of global miRNA expression in these germ cell populations revealed 17 SSC‐, 11 PrM‐ and 13 meiotic‐specific miRNAs. We identified nine miRNAs as specific for both SSC and PrM cells and another nine miRNAs as specific for PrM and meiotic cells. Additionally, 45 miRNAs were identified as commonly expressed in all three cell types. Several of PrM‐ and meiotic‐specific miRNAs were identified as exclusively/preferentially expressed in testis. We were able to identify the relevant target genes for many of these miRNAs. The luciferase reporter assays with SSC (miR‐221)‐, PrM (miR‐203)‐ and meiotic (miR‐34b‐5p)‐specific miRNAs and 3′‐untranslated region constructs of their targets, c‐Kit , Rbm44 and Cdk6 , respectively, showed an approximately 30%–40% decrease in reporter activity. Moreover, we observed a reduced expression of endogenous proteins, c‐Kit and Cdk6, when the testis‐derived cell lines, GC‐1 and GC‐4, were transfected with miRNA mimics for miR‐221 and miR‐34b‐5p, respectively. Conclusions Taken together, we established the miRNA signature of SSC, PrM and meiotic cells and show evidence for their functional relevance during the process of spermatogenesis by target prediction and validation. Through our observations, we propose a working model in which the stage‐specific miRNAs such as miR‐221, ‐203 and ‐34b‐5p coordinate the regulation of spermatogenesis.