Premium
Treatment of Stones in Caliceal Diverticula: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy versus Percutaneous Nephrolitholapaxy
Author(s) -
HENDRIKX A. J. M.,
BIERKENS A. F.,
BOS R.,
OOSTERHOF G. O. N.,
DEBRUYNE F. M. J.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1111/bju.1992.70.5.478
Subject(s) - medicine , extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy , percutaneous , surgery , lithotripsy
Summary Stones in caliceal diverticula may cause symptoms for which treatment is indicated. Both extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PNL) are recommended. We have evaluated the results of ESWL treatment of stone‐containing caliceal diverticula and compared these with the results obtained by percutaneous surgery. In the ESWL group, 15 patients were treated with an electromagnetic lithotriptor (Siemens Lithostar). After 3 months, plain abdominal X‐rays revealed that only 2 patients were both stone‐free and symptom‐free. Of the 13 patients with residual fragments, 7 had no symptoms. The remaining 6 were treated by a lower pole resection (n= 3), a percutaneous procedure (n = 2) and long‐term administration of antibiotics (n = 1). Sixteen patients were treated percutaneously. Puncture failed in 3 and they underwent a lumbotomy. In the remaining 13 patients the stones were reached by direct puncture (n = 12) or via an adjacent calix (n = 1). After 3 months, 10 patients were stone‐free and had no symptoms. Morbidity consisted of post‐operative bleeding (n = 3) and high fever (n = 1). It was concluded that caution should be exercised in the treatment of stone‐containing caliceal diverticula. Only in symptomatic cases is treatment indicated and ESWL is the first choice. If ESWL fails (residual stones and persistent symptoms), PNL should be performed, although it is associated with a higher morbidity rate.