z-logo
Premium
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma: a comparison of outcomes
Author(s) -
Esagian Stepan M.,
Khaki Ali Raza,
Diamantopoulos Leonidas N.,
CarrilAjuria Lucia,
Castellano Daniel,
De Kouchkovsky Ivan,
Park Joseph J.,
Alva Ajjai,
Bilen Mehmet A.,
Stewart Tyler F.,
McKay Rana R.,
Santos Victor S.,
Agarwal Neeraj,
Jain Jayanshu,
Zakharia Yousef,
MoralesBarrera Rafael,
Devitt Michael E.,
Nelson Ariel,
Hoimes Christopher J.,
Shreck Evan,
Gartrell Benjamin A.,
Sankin Alex,
Tripathi Abhishek,
Zakopoulou Roubini,
Bamias Aristotelis,
RodriguezVida Alejo,
Drakaki Alexandra,
Liu Sandy,
Kumar Vivek,
Lythgoe Mark P.,
Pinato David J.,
Murgic Jure,
Fröbe Ana,
Joshi Monika,
Isaacsson Velho Pedro,
Hahn Noah,
Alonso Buznego Lucia,
Duran Ignacio,
Moses Marcus,
Barata Pedro,
Galsky Matthew D.,
Sonpavde Guru,
Yu Evan Y.,
Msaouel Pavlos,
Koshkin Vadim S.,
Grivas Petros
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/bju.15324
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , confidence interval , odds ratio , proportional hazards model , retrospective cohort study , metastatic urothelial carcinoma , cohort , urology , oncology , gastroenterology , cancer , urothelial carcinoma , bladder cancer
Objectives To compare clinical outcomes between patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the upper and lower urinary tract receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs from 2013 to 2020 across 24 institutions. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression‐free survival (PFS) between patients with upper and lower tract UC (UTUC, LTUC). Uni‐ and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of UTUC on ORR, OS, and PFS. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified based on histology (pure, mixed) and line of treatment (first line, subsequent line). Results Out of a total of 746 eligible patients, 707, 717, and 738 were included in the ORR, OS, and PFS analyses, respectively. Our results did not contradict the hypothesis that patients with UTUC and LTUC had similar ORRs (24% vs 28%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–1.24), OS (median 9.8 vs 9.6 months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.73–1.19), and PFS (median 4.3 vs 4.1 months; aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81–1.27). Patients with mixed‐histology UTUC had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS vs mixed‐histology LTUC (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.91 and aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06–2.59), respectively). Conclusion Overall, patients with UTUC and LTUC receiving ICIs have comparable treatment response and outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on histology showed that those with mixed‐histology UTUC had a lower ORR and shorter PFS compared to mixed‐histology LTUC. Further studies and evaluation of molecular biomarkers can help refine patient selection for immunotherapy.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here