z-logo
Premium
High prostate cancer gene 3 ( PCA 3) scores are associated with elevated Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System ( PI ‐ RADS ) grade and biopsy Gleason score, at magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion software‐based targeted prostate biopsy after a previous negative standard biopsy
Author(s) -
De Luca Stefano,
Passera Roberto,
Cattaneo Giovanni,
Manfredi Matteo,
Mele Fabrizio,
Fiori Cristian,
Bollito Enrico,
Cirillo Stefano,
Porpiglia Francesco
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/bju.13504
Subject(s) - prostate cancer , medicine , pca3 , prostate , prostate biopsy , logistic regression , biopsy , urology , receiver operating characteristic , prostate specific antigen , oncology , cancer
Objective To determine the association among prostate cancer gene 3 ( PCA 3) score, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System ( PI ‐ RADS ) grade and Gleason score, in a cohort of patients with elevated prostate‐specific antigen ( PSA ), undergoing magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion software‐based targeted prostate biopsy ( TB x) after a previous negative randomised ‘standard’ biopsy ( SB x). Patients and Methods In all, 282 patients who underwent TB x after previous negative SB x and a PCA 3 urine assay, were enrolled. The associations between PCA 3 score/ PI ‐ RADS and PCA 3 score/Gleason score were investigated by K‐means clustering, a receiver operating characteristic analysis and binary logistic regression. Results The PCA 3 score difference for the negative vs positive TB x cohorts was highly statistically significant. A 1‐unit increase in the PCA 3 score was associated to a 2.4% increased risk of having a positive TB x result. A PCA 3 score of >80 and a PI ‐ RADS grade of ≥4 were independent predictors of a positive TB x. The association between the PCA 3 score and PI ‐ RADS grade was statistically significant (the median PCA 3 score for PI ‐ RADS grade groups 3, 4, and 5 was 58, 104, and 146, respectively; P = 0.006). A similar pattern was detected for the relationship between the PCA 3 score and Gleason score; an increasing PCA 3 score was associated with a worsening Gleason score (median PCA 3 score equal to 62, 105, 132, 153, 203, and 322 for Gleason Score 3+4, 4+3, 4+4, 4+5, 5+4, and 5+5, respectively; P < 0.001). Conclusion TB x improved PCA 3 score diagnostic and prognostic performance for prostate cancer. The PCA 3 score was directly associated both with biopsy Gleason score and PI ‐ RADS grade: notably, in the ‘indeterminate’ PI ‐ RADS grade 3 subgroup.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom