z-logo
Premium
Diffusion‐weighted imaging predicts upgrading of Gleason score in biopsy‐proven low grade prostate cancers
Author(s) -
Park Sung Yoon,
Oh Young Taik,
Jung Dae Chul,
Cho Nam Hoon,
Choi Young Deuk,
Rha Koon Ho,
Hong Sung Joon
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/bju.13436
Subject(s) - prostate cancer , effective diffusion coefficient , receiver operating characteristic , biopsy , medicine , area under the curve , nuclear medicine , logistic regression , univariate analysis , univariate , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging , cancer , multivariate analysis , multivariate statistics , mathematics , statistics
Objective To analyse whether diffusion‐weighted imaging ( DWI ) predicts Gleason score ( GS ) upgrading in biopsy‐proven low grade prostate cancer ( PC a). Patients and Methods A total of 132 patients who had biopsy‐proven low grade ( GS < 7) PC a, 3T DWI results, and surgical confirmation were retrospectively included in the study. Clinical variables (prostate‐specific antigen, greatest percentage of cancer in a biopsy core and percentage of positive cores) and DWI variables (minimum apparent diffusion coefficient [ ADC min ] and mean ADC [ ADC mean ]) were evaluated. ADC min was measured, by two independent, blinded readers, using a region of interest ( ROI ) of 5–10 mm 2 at the area of lowest ADC value within a cancer, while ADC mean was measured using an ROI covering more than half of a cancer. Logistic regression and receiver‐operating characteristic curve analyses were performed. Results The rate of GS upgrading was 46.1% (61/132). In both univariate and multivariate analyses, ADC min and ADC mean were persistently significant for predicting GS upgrading ( P < 0.05), whereas clinical variables were not ( P > 0.05). In both readers’ results, the area under the curve ( AUC ) of ADC min was significantly greater than that of ADC mean (reader 1: AUC 0.760 vs 0.711; P < 0.001; reader 2: AUC 0.752 vs 0.714; P  =   0.003). Conclusion Our results showed that DWI may predict GS upgrading of biopsy‐proven low grade PC a. The variable ADC min in PC a may perform better than ADC mean .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom