Premium
Venous thromboembolism ( VTE ) prophylaxis and urological pelvic cancer surgery: a UK national audit
Author(s) -
Pridgeon Simon,
Allchorne Paula,
Turner Bruce,
Peters John,
Green James
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/bju.12693
Subject(s) - medicine , nice , perioperative , prostatectomy , venous thromboembolism , bladder cancer , cancer , low molecular weight heparin , cystectomy , prostate cancer , audit , general surgery , surgery , heparin , thrombosis , computer science , programming language , management , economics
Objectives To evaluate the use of post‐discharge venous thromboembolism ( VTE ) prophylaxis in UK pelvic cancer centres consistent with national guidelines. Methods Data was collected from healthcare professionals from 64 UK pelvic cancer centres. Results After radical cystectomy ( RC ), all cancer centres routinely use low‐molecular‐weight heparin ( LMWH ) in the perioperative period. After RC 67% of cancer centres use post‐discharge LMWH routinely. After radical prostatectomy ( RP ), 98% of units use perioperative LMWH VTE prophylaxis routinely. After RP , 61% of hospitals always use post‐discharge LMWH . In all, 27% of all UK cancer centres reported deaths or serious VTE complications from urological pelvic cancer surgery in the last 2 years. Conclusions The N ational I nstitute for H ealth and C are E xcellence ( NICE ) issued explicit guidance of VTE prophylaxis after pelvic and abdominal cancer surgery. Conversion of national guidance into local policy is ≈60% for UK pelvic cancer centres. A lack of good quality evidence is cited as a reason for not adhering to NICE guidance.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom