z-logo
Premium
Long‐term follow‐up of sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction
Author(s) -
Peeters Karlien,
Sahai Arun,
De Ridder Dirk,
Van Der Aa Frank
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/bju.12571
Subject(s) - medicine , urinary retention , sacral nerve stimulation , implant , surgery , urinary system , psychological intervention , tertiary referral hospital , retrospective cohort study , psychiatry
Objective To report our long‐term experience of sacral neuromodulation ( SNM ) for various lower urinary tract dysfunctions but with a focus on efficacy, safety, re‐interventions and degree of success. Patients and Methods This is a single tertiary referral centre study that included 217 patients (86% female) who received an implantable pulse generator ( IPG ) ( I nterstim™, M edtronic, M inneapolis, USA ) between 1996 and 2010. Success was considered if the initial ≥50% improvement in any of primary voiding diary variables persisted compared with baseline, but was further stratified. Results The mean duration of follow‐up was 46.88 months. Success and cure rates were ≈70% and 20% for urgency incontinence, 68% and 33% for urgency frequency syndrome and 73% and 58% for idiopathic retention. In those patients with an unsuccessful therapy outcome, the mean time to failure was 24.6 months after implantation. There were 88 (41%) patients who had at least one device or treatment related surgical re‐intervention. The re‐intervention rate was 1.7 per patient with most of them (47%) occurring ≤2 years of follow‐up. Conclusions SNM appears effective in the long‐term with a success rate after definitive IPG implant of ≈70% and complete cure rates ranging between 20% and 58% depending on indication. Patients with idiopathic retention appear to do best. The re‐intervention rate is high with most occurring ≤2 years of implantation. It is likely that with the newer techniques used, efficacy and re‐intervention rates will improve.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here