z-logo
Premium
Evaluation of urinary prostate cancer antigen‐3 ( PCA 3) and TMPRSS 2‐ ERG score changes when starting androgen‐deprivation therapy with triptorelin 6‐month formulation in patients with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer
Author(s) -
MartínezPiñeiro Luis,
Schalken Jack A.,
Cabri Patrick,
Maisonobe Pascal,
Taille Alexandre
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/bju.12542
Subject(s) - medicine , prostate cancer , triptorelin , androgen deprivation therapy , prostate specific antigen , urology , hazard ratio , population , cancer , prospective cohort study , confidence interval , oncology , gynecology , hormone , gonadotropin releasing hormone , environmental health , luteinizing hormone
Objective To assess prostate cancer antigen‐3 ( PCA 3) and TMPRSS 2‐ ERG scores in patients with advanced and metastatic prostate cancer at baseline and after 6 months of treatment with triptorelin 22.5 mg, and analyse these scores in patient‐groups defined by different disease characteristics. Patients and Methods The T riptocare study was a prospective, open‐label, multicentre, single‐arm, P hase III study of triptorelin 22.5 mg in men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer, who were naïve to androgen‐deprivation therapy ( ADT ). The primary objective was to model the urinary PCA 3 change at 6 months, according to baseline variables. Other outcome measures included urinary PCA 3 and TMPRSS 2‐ ERG scores and statuses, and serum testosterone and prostate‐specific antigen ( PSA ) levels at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months after initiation of ADT . Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and changes in laboratory parameters. Results The intent‐to‐treat population comprised 322 patients; 39 (12.1%) had non‐assessable PCA 3 scores at baseline, and 109/322 (33.9%), 215/313 (68.7%) and 232/298 (77.9%) had non‐assessable PCA 3 scores at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively. Baseline G leason score was the only variable associated with non‐assessability of PCA 3 score at 6 months ( P = 0.017) – the hazard of having a non‐assessable PCA 3 score at 6 months was 1.824‐fold higher (95% confidence interval 1.186–2.805) in patients with a G leason score ≥8 vs those with a G leason score ≤6. The median PCA 3 scores at baseline were significantly higher in patients aged ≥65 years vs those aged <65 years and in patients with a serum PSA level <100 ng/mL vs those with serum PSA level of >200 ng/mL. The median PCA 3 score was significantly lower in patients with metastasis than in patients with no metastasis or unknown metastasis status. TMPRSS 2‐ ERG scores ≥35 were considered positive ( n = 149 [51.6%]). Age, presence of metastasis, PSA level and G leason score at baseline were not associated with a significant difference in the proportion of TMPRSS 2‐ ERG ‐positive scores. The median serum PSA levels decreased from 45.5 ng/mL at baseline to 1.2 ng/mL after 6 months, and as expected, >90% of patients achieved castrate levels of testosterone (<50 ng/dL) at 1, 3, and 6 months during triptorelin treatment. The safety profile reported from this study is consistent with the known safety profile of triptorelin. Conclusion These data from the T riptocare study suggest that urinary PCA 3 or TMPRSS 2‐ ERG score are not reliable markers of cancer stage in advanced prostate cancer. Urinary PCA 3 and TMPRSS 2‐ ERG scores do not appear to be useful in assessing response to ADT in advanced prostate cancer, with most patients having non‐assessable scores after 6 months of treatment.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom