Premium
Human like me: Evidence that I‐sharing humanizes the otherwise dehumanized
Author(s) -
Pinel Elizabeth C.,
Yawger Geneva C.,
Long Anson E.,
Rampy Nolan,
Brenna Robert,
Finnell Sasha K.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
british journal of social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 2044-8309
pISSN - 0144-6665
DOI - 10.1111/bjso.12209
Subject(s) - outgroup , dehumanization , ingroups and outgroups , psychology , social psychology , white (mutation) , sociology , anthropology , biochemistry , chemistry , gene
People persistently undermine the humanness of outgroup members, leaving researchers perplexed as to how to address this problem of ‘dehumanization’ (Haslam & Loughnan, [Haslam, N., 2014], Ann Rev of Psychol, 65, 399 ; Leyens, [Leyens, J. P., 2009], Group Process Intergroup Relat, 12 , 807). Here, we test whether I‐sharing (i.e., sharing a subjective experience) counters this tendency by promoting the humanization of outgroup members. In Study 1, White participants had a face‐to‐face meeting with a White or Black confederate and either did or did not I‐share with this confederate. The extent to which participants humanized the outgroup member depended on whether or not they I‐shared with her. Study 2 tested the effect of I‐sharing on the two distinct dimensions of dehumanization (Haslam, [Haslam, N., 2006], Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 10 , 252). Conceptually replicating the results of Study 1, participants who I‐shared with a social class ingroup or outgroup member rated their partner as higher in human nature than those who did not I‐share with their partner. These results add to the growing literature on I‐sharing's implications for intergroup processes and suggest effective ways of tackling a persistent problem.