z-logo
Premium
Looking back on the L ondon O lympics: Independent outcome and hindsight effects in decision evaluation
Author(s) -
Blank Hartmut,
Diedenhofen Birk,
Musch Jochen
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
british journal of social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 2044-8309
pISSN - 0144-6665
DOI - 10.1111/bjso.12116
Subject(s) - hindsight bias , outcome (game theory) , psychology , social psychology , microeconomics , economics
Outcome bias and hindsight bias are related, but how exactly? To remedy theoretical ambiguity and non‐existent directly relevant empirical research, we contrast an older idea ( B aron & H ershey, 1988, J . P ers . S oc . P sychol ., 54, 569) that sees outcome bias as partly mediated through hindsight bias with the idea that the two biases independently affect decision evaluations. In an I nternet study of retrospections on the 2012 L ondon O lympics, evaluations of the G ames' success and its foreseeability had independent effects on evaluations of the I nternational O lympic C ommittee's decision to award the O lympics to L ondon; there was no evidence of mediation. Further theoretical discussion emphasizes the need to distinguish between a holistic assessment of decisions and a more specific assessment of the decision‐making process in future outcome bias research.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom