Premium
Coping with structural disadvantage: Overcoming negative effects of perceived barriers through bonding identities
Author(s) -
Bakouri Mouna,
Staerklé Christian
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
british journal of social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 2044-8309
pISSN - 0144-6665
DOI - 10.1111/bjso.12102
Subject(s) - psychology , disadvantaged , social psychology , coping (psychology) , stressor , apprenticeship , disadvantage , social identity theory , developmental psychology , social group , clinical psychology , linguistics , philosophy , political science , law
Members of socially disadvantaged groups often experience societal devaluation, material hardship, and restricted opportunities, especially during critical life‐course transitions. In this study, we investigate whether what we term ‘bonding identities’, that is identities connecting the self to significant persons whether in terms of social relationships (e.g., family relations) or in terms of categorical collective identities, help individuals negotiate structural constraints on life‐course opportunities. We develop and test a model according to which greater perceived barriers to one's life projects are psychologically harmful. We then test whether bonding identities function as a buffer against these stressors' negative psychological effects. Data were collected with a standardized questionnaire from pre‐apprentices, apprentices, and young employees in two institutions ( N = 365). Results confirm that perceiving barriers to one's life project was harmful for self‐esteem. However, for participants who defined themselves in terms of bonding identities, greater perceived barriers did not decrease their perceived coping efficacy and were less harmful for their self‐esteem. These findings point to the empowering role of bonding identities (and the social relationships that they imply) for disadvantaged group members.