z-logo
Premium
A phase II trial of continuous ixazomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: the Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium (AMaRC) 16‐02 trial
Author(s) -
Bergin Krystal,
Yuen Flora,
WallingtonBeddoe Craig,
Kalff Anna,
Sirdesai Shreerang,
Reynolds John,
Spencer Andrew
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
british journal of haematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.907
H-Index - 186
eISSN - 1365-2141
pISSN - 0007-1048
DOI - 10.1111/bjh.17504
Subject(s) - tolerability , medicine , thalidomide , ixazomib , multiple myeloma , lenalidomide , dexamethasone , adverse effect , refractory (planetary science) , clinical trial , hazard ratio , confidence interval , surgery , gastroenterology , carfilzomib , physics , astrobiology
Summary We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of continuous ixazomib‐thalidomide‐dexamethasone (ITd: 4 mg, day 1, 8, 15; 100 mg daily; and 40 mg weekly). A total of 39 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) aged ≥18 years with one to three prior lines of therapy were enrolled from two tertiary centres in Victoria and South Australia, Australia. The overall response rate (ORR) was 56·4% with a clinical benefit rate of 71·8%. The median progression‐free survival was 13·8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8·2–22·2] and median overall survival was not reached. The median time to best response and duration of response was 3·7 months (95% CI 2·8–10·5) and 18·4 months (95% CI 10·2–31·0) respectively. Prior immunomodulatory drug (IMID) exposure was associated with a lower ORR (40% vs. 73·7%, P  = 0·03). Survival outcomes in patients with prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) and/or IMID exposure were similar. Patients received a median (range) of 11 (1–31) cycles of therapy and six patients (15%) remained on therapy at the time of final analysis. Grade 3/4 haematological and non‐haematological adverse events were reported in 7·7% and 20·6% of patients respectively. ITd dose reductions were required in 15·4%, 48·7% and 35·9% of patients respectively. The present study demonstrates promising effectiveness and tolerability of ITd as an affordable all‐oral PI‐IMID approach for RRMM.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here