Premium
Impact of graft‐versus‐host disease and graft‐versus‐leukemia effect based on minimal residual disease in Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Author(s) -
Akahoshi Yu,
Igarashi Aiko,
Fukuda Takahiro,
Uchida Naoyuki,
Tanaka Masatsugu,
Ozawa Yukiyasu,
Kanda Yoshinobu,
Onizuka Makoto,
Ichinohe Tatsuo,
Tanaka Junji,
Atsuta Yoshiko,
Kako Shinichi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
british journal of haematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.907
H-Index - 186
eISSN - 1365-2141
pISSN - 0007-1048
DOI - 10.1111/bjh.16540
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , minimal residual disease , hematopoietic stem cell transplantation , graft versus host disease , lymphoblastic leukemia , confidence interval , leukemia , philadelphia chromosome , transplantation , gastroenterology , acute leukemia , immunology , oncology , chromosomal translocation , biochemistry , chemistry , gene
Summary The impacts of graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) and graft‐versus‐leukemia (GVL) effect might differ depending on minimal residual disease (MRD). Therefore, we examined 1,022 recipients who underwent their first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph‐positive ALL) in first complete remission. MRD status at HSCT was negative in 791 (77·4%) and positive in 231 (22·6%). The impact of GVHD as a time‐dependent covariate on transplant outcomes were analyzed while adjusting for other possible variables. Mild acute GVHD [hazard ratio (HR), 0·90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0·70–1·16; P = 0·901] and chronic GVHD (HR, 0·82, 95% CI, 0·58–1·14; P = 0·238) were not significantly associated with overall mortality, whereas severe acute GVHD (HR, 2·26, 95% CI, 1·64–3·11; P < 0·001) resulted in inferior overall survival due to high non‐relapse mortality. Moreover, even in the subgroup analyses stratified according to MRD status, acute and chronic GVHD were not significantly associated with better overall survival. Therefore, less intensive GVHD prophylaxis to achieve a GVL effect is not recommended for Ph‐positive ALL.