z-logo
Premium
A phase I/II trial of bortezomib combined concurrently with gemcitabine for relapsed or refractory DLBCL and peripheral T ‐cell lymphomas
Author(s) -
Evens Andrew M.,
Rosen Steven T.,
Helenowski Irene,
Kline Justin,
Larsen Annette,
Colvin Jennifer,
Winter Jane N.,
Besien Koen M.,
Gordon Leo I.,
Smith Sonali M.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
british journal of haematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.907
H-Index - 186
eISSN - 1365-2141
pISSN - 0007-1048
DOI - 10.1111/bjh.12488
Subject(s) - bortezomib , gemcitabine , medicine , neutropenia , tolerability , refractory (planetary science) , phases of clinical research , gastroenterology , oncology , peripheral t cell lymphoma , lymphoma , surgery , clinical trial , chemotherapy , adverse effect , multiple myeloma , t cell , immunology , immune system , physics , astrobiology
Summary There remains an unmet therapeutic need for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B ‐cell lymphoma ( DLBCL ) and peripheral T ‐cell lymphoma ( PTCL ). We conducted a phase I/ II trial with bortezomib (dose‐escalated to 1·6 mg/m 2 ) given concurrently with gemcitabine (800 mg/m 2 ) days 1 + 8 q21 d. Of 32 patients, 16 each had relapsed/refractory PTCL and DLBCL . Median prior therapies were 3 and 35% had failed transplant. Among the first 18 patients, 67% experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia and/or grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia resulting in repeated treatment delays (relative dose intensity: 46%). Thus, the study was amended to give bortezomib and gemcitabine days 1 + 15 q28 d, which resulted in markedly improved tolerability. Among all patients, the overall response rate ( ORR ) was 24% with 19% complete remission ( CR ; intent‐to‐treat ( ITT ) ORR 16%, CR 13%), which met criteria for futility. The ORR for DLBCL was 10% ( CR 10%) vs. 36% for PTCL ( CR 27%). Among 6 PTCL patients treated on the modified schedule, ORR by ITT was 50% ( CR 30%). Altogether, concurrent bortezomib/gemcitabine given days 1 + 8 q21 d was not tolerable, while modification to a bi‐monthly schedule allowed consistent treatment delivery. Whereas efficacy of this combination was low in heavily pre‐treated DLBCL , there was a signal of activity in relapsed/refractory PTCL utilizing the modified schedule.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom