z-logo
Premium
CEBPA double‐mutated acute myeloid leukaemia harbours concomitant molecular mutations in 76·8% of cases with TET 2 and GATA 2 alterations impacting prognosis
Author(s) -
Grossmann Vera,
Haferlach Claudia,
Nadarajah Niroshan,
Fasan Annette,
Weissmann Sandra,
Roller Andreas,
Eder Christiane,
Stopp Elisa,
Kern Wolfgang,
Haferlach Torsten,
Kohlmann Alexander,
Schnittger Susanne
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
british journal of haematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.907
H-Index - 186
eISSN - 1365-2141
pISSN - 0007-1048
DOI - 10.1111/bjh.12297
Subject(s) - cebpa , myeloid leukaemia , mutation , myeloid , concomitant , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , gene , chemistry , genetics , medicine , immunology
Summary Acute myeloid leukaemia ( AML ) with CEBPA mutations is listed as a provisional entity in the current World Health Organization classification. A difference in clinical outcome between single‐ (sm) and double‐mutated (dm) cases has been reported, whereupon CEBPA dm cases were shown to be associated with better overall survival ( OS ). The occurrence and prognostic impact of concomitant molecular mutations in addition to CEBPA dm has not been assessed until now with exception of GATA 2 mutations. Here, we investigated a cohort of 95 AML CEBPA dm cases for concomitant mutations. TET 2 was found to be most frequently mutated (34·0%) gene, followed by GATA 2 (21·0%), WT 1 (13·7%), DNMT 3A (9·6%), ASXL 1 (9·5%), NRAS (8·4%), KRAS (3·2%), IDH 1/2 (6·3%), FLT 3 ‐internal tandem duplication (6·3%), FLT 3 ‐tyrosine kinase domain (2·1%), NPM 1 (2·1%), and RUNX 1 (1/94). Patients harbouring additional mutations in the TET 2 gene showed significantly worse OS than TET 2 wild‐type cases ( P  =   0·035), whereas GATA 2 ‐mutated patients showed improved OS ( P  =   0·032). Serial analyses were performed for 39 CEBPA dm cases with concomitant mutations. Here, we observed that CEBPA mutations present the primary pathogenetic event in the majority of cases (76·9%). Further, a distinct gene expression profile ( GEP ) was confirmed for CEBPA dm versus CEBPA sm or CEBPA wild‐type cases while no significant changes in GEP were observed related to additional mutations within the CEBPA dm AML .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom