Premium
Cultural differences in the understanding of modelling and feedback as sources of self‐efficacy information
Author(s) -
Ahn Hyun Seon,
Usher Ellen L.,
Butz Amanda,
Bong Mimi
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
british journal of educational psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.557
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 2044-8279
pISSN - 0007-0998
DOI - 10.1111/bjep.12093
Subject(s) - persuasion , collectivism , psychology , self efficacy , structural equation modeling , social psychology , confirmatory factor analysis , social influence , hofstede's cultural dimensions theory , developmental psychology , uncertainty avoidance , individualism , statistics , mathematics , political science , law
Background The potential role of culture in the development and operation of self‐efficacy has been acknowledged by researchers. Clearer understanding of this cultural impact will benefit from research that shows how the same efficacy information is evaluated across cultures. Aims We tested whether two sources of self‐efficacy information delivered by multiple social agents (i.e., vicarious experience and social persuasion) were weighed differently by adolescents in different cultures. Sample Of 2,893 middle school students in Korea ( n = 416), the Philippines ( n = 522), and the United States ( n = 1,955) who completed the survey, 400 students were randomly pooled from each country. Methods Invariance of the measurement and of the latent means for self‐efficacy and self‐efficacy sources across the groups was tested by multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. Predictive utility of the self‐efficacy sources was compared by multigroup structural equation modelling. Results Compared to the students in the two collectivistic countries, the US students reported significantly higher mathematics self‐efficacy. Whereas the efficacy beliefs of the Korean and the US students were predicted equally well by the vicarious experience from their teachers and the social persuasion by their family and peers, those of the Filipino adolescents were best predicted by the social persuasion from their peers. Conclusions This study provided empirical evidence that socially conveyed sources of self‐efficacy information are construed and evaluated differently across cultures, depending on who delivered the efficacy‐relevant information.