Premium
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma: abridged Cochrane systematic review and GRADE assessments
Author(s) -
Thomson J.,
Hogan S.,
LeonardiBee J.,
Williams H. C.,
BathHextall F .J.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
british journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.304
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1365-2133
pISSN - 0007-0963
DOI - 10.1111/bjd.19809
Subject(s) - medicine , basal cell carcinoma , psychological intervention , grading (engineering) , randomized controlled trial , skin cancer , medline , incidence (geometry) , relative risk , surgery , systematic review , meta analysis , mohs surgery , pediatrics , confidence interval , basal cell , cancer , civil engineering , physics , optics , psychiatry , political science , law , engineering
Summary Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer affecting white‐skinned individuals, and the worldwide incidence is increasing. Although rarely fatal, BCC is associated with significant morbidity and costs. Objectives To assess the effects of interventions for primary BCC in immunocompetent adults. Methods We updated our searches of the following databases to November 2019: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and LILACS. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Results We included 52 randomized controlled trials with 6990 participants (median age 65 years; range 20–95). Mean study duration was 13 months (range 6 weeks–10 years). Ninety‐two per cent ( n = 48/52) of studies exclusively included histologically low‐risk BCC (nodular and superficial subtypes). The certainty of evidence was predominantly low or moderate for the outcomes of interest. Overall, surgical interventions have the lowest recurrence rates, and there may be slightly fewer recurrences with Mohs micrographic surgery over surgical excision for primary, facial BCC (high‐risk histological subtype or located in the ‘H‐zone’ or both) (low‐certainty evidence). Nonsurgical treatments, when used for low‐risk BCC, are less effective than surgical treatments, but recurrence rates are acceptable and cosmetic outcomes are probably superior. Conclusions Surgical interventions have lower recurrence rates and remain the gold standard for high‐risk BCC. Of the nonsurgical treatments, topical imiquimod has the best evidence to support its efficacy for low‐risk BCC. Priorities for future research include agreement on core outcome measures and studies with longer follow‐up.