z-logo
Premium
Development and validation of a multivariable risk prediction model for serious infection in patients with psoriasis receiving systemic therapy
Author(s) -
Yiu Z.Z.N.,
Sorbe C.,
Lunt M.,
Rustenbach S.J.,
Kühl L.,
Augustin M.,
Mason K.J.,
Ashcroft D.M.,
Griffiths C.E.M.,
Warren R.B.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
british journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.304
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1365-2133
pISSN - 0007-0963
DOI - 10.1111/bjd.17421
Subject(s) - psoriasis , systemic therapy , medicine , multivariable calculus , systemic risk , intensive care medicine , risk of infection , dermatology , engineering , economics , macroeconomics , financial crisis , cancer , control engineering , breast cancer , genetics , biology
Summary Background Patients with psoriasis are often concerned about the risk of serious infection associated with systemic psoriasis treatments. Objectives To develop and externally validate a prediction model for serious infection in patients with psoriasis within 1 year of starting systemic therapies. Methods The risk prediction model was developed using the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register ( BADBIR ), and the German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest was used as the validation dataset. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed internally and externally using the C ‐statistic, the calibration slope and the calibration in the large. Results Overall 175 (1·7%) out of 10 033 participants from BADBIR and 41 (1·7%) out of 2423 participants from PsoBest developed a serious infection within 1 year of therapy initiation. Selected predictors in a multiple logistic regression model included nine baseline covariates, and starting infliximab was the strongest predictor. Evaluation of model performance showed a bootstrap optimism‐corrected C ‐statistic of 0·64 [95% confidence interval ( CI ) 0·60–0·69], calibration in the large of 0·02 (95% CI −0·14 to 0·17) and a calibration slope of 0·88 (95% CI 0·70–1·07), while external validation performance was poor, with C ‐statistic 0·52 (95% CI 0·42–0·62), calibration in the large 0·06 (95% CI −0·25 to 0·37) and calibration slope 0·36 (95% CI −0·24 to 0·97). Conclusions We present the first results of the development of a multivariable prediction model. This model may help patients and dermatologists in the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland to identify modifiable risk factors and inform therapy choice in a shared decision‐making process.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom