Premium
Definition of psoriasis severity in routine clinical care: current guidelines fail to capture the complexity of long‐term psoriasis management
Author(s) -
Augustin M.,
Langenbruch A.,
Gutknecht M.,
Reich K.,
Körber A.,
Maaßen D.,
Mrowietz U.,
Thaçi D.,
Kiedrowski R.,
Radtke M.A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
british journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.304
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1365-2133
pISSN - 0007-0963
DOI - 10.1111/bjd.17128
Subject(s) - psoriasis , dermatology life quality index , psoriasis area and severity index , medicine , severity of illness , disease , quality of life (healthcare) , dermatology , systemic therapy , nursing , cancer , breast cancer
Summary Background Assessment of disease severity is an essential component of psoriasis management. Moderate‐to‐severe disease qualifies for systemic treatment but different definitions are used. Objectives To analyse the impact of different severity definitions for psoriasis in real‐world healthcare. Methods Cross‐sectional data on 3274 patients with psoriasis from more than 200 dermatology offices and clinics across Germany were analysed for disease severity based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index ( PASI ) and Dermatology Life Quality Index ( DLQI ). The proportions of patients having moderate‐to‐severe disease were determined accordingly. Results The proportion of patients meeting the European consensus criteria for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis ( PASI AND DLQI > 10) was 14·0%, although 45·3% attained at least PASI OR DLQI > 10. Consideration of all patients on systemic drugs as being ‘moderate‐to‐severe’ increased these proportions to 56·9% and 75·2%, respectively. When only PASI > 10 was used, moderate‐to‐severe disease affected 35·3% and 69·3%, respectively. Conclusions The proportion of patients with psoriasis under dermatological care considered to have moderate‐to‐severe disease varies considerably according to how the latter is defined, resulting in uncertainty and inequity of access to systemic therapy. We propose an international standardisation in this for the sake of more reliable treatment and healthcare planning.