Premium
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) in paediatric cutaneous lupus among paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists
Author(s) -
Kushner C.J.,
Tarazi M.,
Gaffney R.G.,
Feng R.,
Ardalan K.,
BrandlingBennett H.A.,
CasteloSoccio L.,
Chang J.C.,
Chiu Y.E.,
Gmuca S.,
Hunt R.D.,
Kahn P.J.,
Knight A.M.,
Mehta J.,
Pearson D.R.,
Treat J.R.,
Wan J.,
Yeguez A.C.,
Concha J.S.S.,
Patel B.,
Okawa J.,
Arkin L.M.,
Werth V.P.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
british journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.304
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1365-2133
pISSN - 0007-0963
DOI - 10.1111/bjd.17012
Subject(s) - medicine , intraclass correlation , intra rater reliability , reliability (semiconductor) , lupus erythematosus , severity of illness , physical therapy , dermatology , confidence interval , psychometrics , clinical psychology , power (physics) , physics , antibody , quantum mechanics , immunology
Summary Background The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index ( CLASI ) is a reliable outcome measure for cutaneous lupus erythematosus ( CLE ) in adults used in clinical trials. However, it has not been validated in children, limiting clinical trials for paediatric CLE . Objectives This study aimed to validate the CLASI in paediatrics. Methods Eleven paediatric patients with CLE , six dermatologists and six rheumatologists participated. The physicians were trained to use the CLASI and Physician's Global Assessment ( PGA ), and individually rated all patients using both tools. Each physician reassessed two randomly selected patients. Within each physician group, the intraclass correlation coefficient ( ICC ) was calculated to assess the reliability of each measure. Results CLASI activity scores demonstrated excellent inter‐ and intrarater reliability ( ICC > 0·90), while the PGA activity scores had good inter‐rater reliability ( ICC 0·73–0·77) among both specialties. PGA activity scores showed excellent ( ICC 0·89) and good intrarater reliability ( ICC 0·76) for dermatologists and rheumatologists, respectively. Limitations of this study include the small sample size of patients and potential recall bias during the physician rerating session. Conclusions CLASI activity measurement showed excellent inter‐ and intrarater reliability in paediatric CLE and superiority over the PGA . These results demonstrate that the CLASI is a reliable and valid outcome instrument for paediatric CLE .