z-logo
Premium
Intensified fractional CO 2 laser‐assisted photodynamic therapy vs. laser alone for organ transplant recipients with multiple actinic keratoses and wart‐like lesions: a randomized half‐side comparative trial on dorsal hands
Author(s) -
Helsing P.,
TogsverdBo K.,
Veierød M.B.,
Mørk G.,
Hædersdal M.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
british journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.304
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1365-2133
pISSN - 0007-0963
DOI - 10.1111/bjd.12507
Subject(s) - photodynamic therapy , medicine , actinic keratosis , tolerability , ablative case , field cancerization , dermatology , lesion , randomized controlled trial , keratosis , actinic keratoses , urology , surgery , adverse effect , cancer , radiation therapy , basal cell , chemistry , organic chemistry
Summary Background Photodynamic therapy ( PDT ) is a well‐documented treatment for actinic keratosis ( AK ), but achieves inferior efficacy in organ transplant recipients ( OTR s), particularly in acral regions. Ablative fractional laser ( AFXL ) intensifies the PDT response and may improve the efficacy of AK clearance when used as monotherapy. Objectives To compare the efficacy of a single treatment with AFXL ‐assisted PDT vs. AFXL alone for difficult‐to‐treat AK s and wart‐like lesions ( WLL s) in OTR s. Methods Ten OTR s were included with a total of 680 AK s (severity grade I– III ) and 409 WLL s on the dorsal hands. Both hands were initially treated with targeted fractional ablation of thick keratotic lesions followed by AFXL field treatment. Treatment regions were then randomized to (i) PDT ( AFXL ‐ PDT ) or (ii) no further treatment ( AFXL ). The primary end point was complete response ( CR ) at 4 months after treatment; secondary end points were improvement of AK severity grade, overall patient assessment of efficacy and tolerability of treatments. Results CR of AK s was significantly higher for AFXL ‐ PDT (73%) compared with AFXL alone (31%) ( P  =   0·002). AFXL ‐ PDT improved 82% of AK s to lower lesion grades compared with 52% after AFXL alone ( P  =   0·008). For WLL s, the rate of CR was 37% for AFXL ‐ PDT compared with 14% for AFXL ( P  =   0·02). Overall assessment showed a preference for AFXL ‐ PDT compared with AFXL ( AFXL ‐ PDT , n  =   8; AFXL , n  =   0; equal, n  =   2). Mild pigment changes were observed in four patients ( AFXL ‐ PDT , n  =   3; AFXL , n  =   1). No scarring was observed. Conclusions AFXL ‐ PDT is more effective than AFXL in the treatment of acral AK s and WLL s in OTR s.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom