Efficacy and safety of infliximab as continuous or intermittent therapy in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis: results of a randomized, long‐term extension trial ( RESTORE 2)

Summary Background Continuous maintenance therapy with infliximab 5 mg kg −1 every 8 weeks is effective for moderate‐to‐severe plaque‐type psoriasis. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous vs. intermittent infliximab maintenance therapy. Methods RESTORE 2 was a long‐term extension of RESTORE 1. At baseline of RESTORE 2, eligible patients who had received infliximab for 26 weeks and achieved P soriasis A rea and S everity I ndex ( PASI ) 75 in RESTORE 1 were rerandomized 1 : 1 to continuous therapy (infliximab 5 mg kg −1 every 8 weeks) or intermittent therapy (no infliximab until > 50% loss of PASI improvement). Safety and efficacy assessments occurred throughout the study. Results In total, 222 patients were randomized to receive continuous therapy, and 219 to intermittent therapy. More serious infusion‐related reactions occurred with intermittent therapy (8/219 patients, 4%) than with continuous therapy (1/222 patients, < 1%), leading the sponsor to terminate the study. The mean duration of exposure to infliximab was 40·12 weeks ( SD 27·55) with a mean of 5·8 infusions (range 0–16) for continuous therapy and 22·78 weeks ( SD 22·98) with a mean of 3·4 infusions (range 0–16) for intermittent therapy. Although no formal efficacy analyses were conducted, continuous therapy led to greater PASI 75 at week 52 in the continuous group (81/101, 80%) than in the intermittent group (39/83, 47%); several other efficacy measures demonstrated similar patterns. Conclusions For patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque‐type psoriasis, continuous therapy with infliximab may be more effective than intermittent therapy. The incidence of serious infusion‐related reactions in the intermittent group suggests that clinicians should avoid intermittent therapy in this population.