Premium
Routine Use of an Antenatal Infection Screen‐and‐Treat Program to Prevent Preterm Birth: Long‐Term Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center
Author(s) -
Farr Alex,
Kiss Herbert,
Hagmann Michael,
Marschalek Julian,
Husslein Peter,
Petricevic Ljubomir
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
birth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.233
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1523-536X
pISSN - 0730-7659
DOI - 10.1111/birt.12154
Subject(s) - medicine , obstetrics , bacterial vaginosis , pregnancy , gestational age , referral , prenatal care , pediatrics , asymptomatic , miscarriage , trichomoniasis , incidence (geometry) , population , gynecology , surgery , family medicine , genetics , biology , physics , optics , environmental health
Background Vaginal infection in early pregnancy is associated with preterm birth. This study evaluates long‐term results after integrating an antenatal screen‐and‐treat program for asymptomatic vaginal infections into routine pregnancy care. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of all women with singleton high‐risk pregnancies delivering at our tertiary referral center between 2005 and 2014. The intervention group included women who presented for a prenatal visit for a planned birth between 10 + 0 and 16 + 0 gestational weeks. Women were routinely screened for asymptomatic infections using Gram stain. In cases of bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis or trichomoniasis, women were treated according to our clinical protocol. The control group included women who did not undergo the program. Prenatal care was equal in both groups. Preterm birth served as the primary outcome variable. Results Of the 20,052 women with singleton pregnancies, 8,490 (42.3%) participated in the antenatal prevention program. The mean gestational age at birth was 38.8 ± 2.6 weeks and 37.5 ± 4.3 weeks in the intervention and control groups, respectively ( p < 0.001). The incidence of preterm birth was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (9.7% vs 22.3%; p < 0.001). Low‐birthweight neonates, stillbirths, and late miscarriages were less frequent in the intervention group ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Long‐term results support the use of an antenatal infection screen‐and‐treat program to prevent preterm birth. If integrated into routine pregnancy care at a high‐risk obstetrical setting, this simple public health intervention could lead to a significant reduction in preterm birth, low infant birthweight, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.