z-logo
Premium
Adaptive treatment and robust control
Author(s) -
Clairon Q.,
Henderson R.,
Young N. J.,
Wilson E. D.,
Taylor C. J.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
biometrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.298
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1541-0420
pISSN - 0006-341X
DOI - 10.1111/biom.13268
Subject(s) - robustness (evolution) , computer science , inference , statistical inference , machine learning , perspective (graphical) , stability (learning theory) , robust control , artificial intelligence , data mining , control system , mathematics , statistics , engineering , biochemistry , chemistry , electrical engineering , gene
Abstract A control theory perspective on determination of optimal dynamic treatment regimes is considered. The aim is to adapt statistical methodology that has been developed for medical or other biostatistical applications to incorporate powerful control techniques that have been designed for engineering or other technological problems. Data tend to be sparse and noisy in the biostatistical area and interest has tended to be in statistical inference for treatment effects. In engineering fields, experimental data can be more easily obtained and reproduced and interest is more often in performance and stability of proposed controllers rather than modeling and inference per se. We propose that modeling and estimation should be based on standard statistical techniques but subsequent treatment policy should be obtained from robust control. To bring focus, we concentrate on A‐learning methodology as developed in the biostatistical literature and H ∞ ‐synthesis from control theory. Simulations and two applications demonstrate robustness of the H ∞ strategy compared to standard A‐learning in the presence of model misspecification or measurement error.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here