Premium
Differential relations between fronto‐limbic metabolism and executive function in patients with remitted bipolar I and bipolar II disorder
Author(s) -
Li ChengTa,
Hsieh JenChuen,
Wang ShyhJen,
Yang BangHung,
Bai YaMei,
Lin WeiChen,
Lan ChenChia,
Su TungPing
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
bipolar disorders
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.285
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1399-5618
pISSN - 1398-5647
DOI - 10.1111/bdi.12017
Subject(s) - bipolar disorder , bipolar ii disorder , psychology , wisconsin card sorting test , mood , neuropsychology , bipolar i disorder , prefrontal cortex , medicine , cognition , psychiatry , audiology , mania
Li C‐T, Hsieh J‐C, Wang S‐J, Yang B‐H, Bai Y‐M, Lin W‐C, Lan C‐C, Su T‐P. Differential relations between fronto‐limbic metabolism and executive function in patients with remitted bipolar I and bipolar II disorder.
Bipolar Disord 2012: 14: 831–842. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between resting brain glucose metabolism and cognitive profiles in patients with remitted bipolar I disorder (BD‐I) and bipolar II disorder (BD‐II). We hypothesized that BD‐I patients (compared to BD‐II patients) would perform worse on tests of cognitive function because of abnormal metabolism in the prefrontal cortex and other mood‐related brain areas. Methods: Thirty‐four patients with remitted bipolar disorder (BD) (BD‐I = 17, BD‐II = 17) under treatment and 17 well‐matched healthy controls received both fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F‐FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and neuropsychological tests of attention, memory, and executive function. Results: Clinical features in patients with BD‐I and BD‐II were comparable. Executive function, as indicated by performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, was significantly worse (i.e., higher percentage of errors, lower percentage of conceptual level responses, and fewer categories completed) in BD‐I patients than in BD‐II patients and healthy subjects. No difference in attention and memory tests was found among these three groups. Brain PET analysis showed that BD‐I patients (compared to BD‐II patients) had significantly lower glucose uptake in the bilateral anterior cingulum, insula, striatum, and part of the prefrontal cortex, and higher glucose uptake in the left parahippocampus. Further analyses revealed significant correlations between poor executive function and abnormal glucose uptake in other brain areas in BD‐I patients. Conclusions: There are neurobiological differences between subtypes of BD. BD‐I is associated with more impaired fronto‐limbic circuitry, which might account for reduced executive function in BD‐I patients during remission.