Premium
A 10‐Year Experience of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ( TDM ) of Linezolid in a Hospital‐wide Population of Patients Receiving Conventional Dosing: Is there Enough Evidence for Suggesting TDM in the Majority of Patients?
Author(s) -
Pea Federico,
Cojutti Pier Giorgio,
Baraldo Massimo
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
basic and clinical pharmacology and toxicology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.805
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1742-7843
pISSN - 1742-7835
DOI - 10.1111/bcpt.12797
Subject(s) - cmin , linezolid , dosing , medicine , therapeutic drug monitoring , population , cmax , drug , pharmacology , pharmacokinetics , staphylococcus aureus , vancomycin , biology , bacteria , environmental health , genetics
A retrospective study was conducted to assess our 10‐year experience of therapeutic drug monitoring ( TDM ) of linezolid in a large patient population to establish whether conventional dosing may result in adequate drug exposure in the majority of patients. Patients included in this study underwent TDM of linezolid trough concentration ( C min ) during treatment with conventional doses of 600 mg every 12 hr in the period between January 2007 and June 2016. The desired range of C min was set between 2 and 7 mg/L (underexposure, C min < 2 mg/L; overexposure, C min > 7 mg/L). Multivariate logistic regression analysis investigated variables potentially correlated with linezolid C min . One thousand and forty‐nine patients had 2484 linezolid C min assessed during treatment with conventional doses. Median ( IQR ) linezolid C min was 5.08 mg/L (2.78–8.52 mg/L). Linezolid C min was within the desired range in 50.8% of cases (1262/2484). Overexposure (n = 821; 33%) occurred much more frequently than underexposure (n = 401; 16.2%) and was severe (>20 mg/L) in 3.9% of cases (98/2484). Linezolid overexposure was significantly associated with Cr CL C ‐G estimates ≤40 mL/min. (OR 1.463; 95% CI 1.124–1.904, p = 0.005). Linezolid underexposure was significantly associated with Cr CL C ‐G estimates >100 mL/min. ( OR 3.046; 95% CI 2.234–4.152, p < 0.001). Linezolid C min was not correlated linearly with Cr CL C ‐G ( R 2 = 0.061). Variability in renal function explained only partially the very wide interindividual linezolid C min variability. Our study suggests that TDM could represent a valuable approach in optimizing linezolid exposure in the majority of patients.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom