Premium
Economic evaluation of remdesivir for the treatment of severe COVID‐19 patients in China under different scenarios
Author(s) -
Jiang Yawen,
Cai Dan,
Chen Daqin,
Jiang Shan,
Si Lei,
Wu Jing
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1111/bcp.14860
Subject(s) - medicine , quality adjusted life year , cost effectiveness analysis , per capita , asymptomatic , regimen , cost effectiveness , economic evaluation , cost–benefit analysis , health care , covid-19 , gross domestic product , demography , environmental health , population , surgery , disease , risk analysis (engineering) , economics , infectious disease (medical specialty) , ecology , pathology , sociology , biology , economic growth
Aims The present study aimed to evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of the 5‐day remdesivir regimen compared with standard of care among severe COVID‐19 patients in China, the evidence on which is essential to inform the necessity of securing access to remdesivir. Methods A dynamic transmission model that extended the susceptible–exposed–infected–recovered framework by incorporating asymptomatic, presymptomatic and waiting‐to‐be‐diagnosed patients was constructed to conduct the cost‐effectiveness analysis from the healthcare system perspective. To estimate epidemic parameters, the model was first calibrated to the observed epidemic curve in Wuhan from 23 January to 19 March 2020. Following the calibration, the infected compartment was replaced by 3 severity‐defined health states to reflect differential costs and quality of life associated with disease gravity. Costs and quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) outcomes of 9 million simulated people were accrued across time to evaluate the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of remdesivir. As robustness checks, an alternative modelling technique using decision tree, additional epidemic scenarios representing different epidemic intensities, and 1‐way parameter variations were also analysed. Results Remdesivir treatment cost CN¥97.93 million more than standard of care. Also, the net QALY gain from 5‐day remdesivir treatment was 6947 QALYs. As such, the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio was CN¥14 098/QALY, substantially lower than the gross domestic product per capita threshold. The peak daily number of severe cases was 19% lower in the remdesivir treatment strategy. Overall, results were robust in alternative scenarios and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Given the cost‐effectiveness profile, access to remdesivir for severe COVID‐19 patients in China should be considered.