Premium
A case–control study to assess the ability of the thymine challenge test to predict patients with severe to life threatening fluoropyrimidine‐induced gastrointestinal toxicity
Author(s) -
Helsby Nuala A.,
Duley John,
Burns Kathryn E.,
Bonnet Claire,
Jeong Soo Hee,
Brenman Elliott,
Barlow Paula,
Sharples Katrina,
Porter David,
Findlay Michael
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1111/bcp.14153
Subject(s) - dpyd , interquartile range , medicine , creatinine , common terminology criteria for adverse events , renal function , confidence interval , toxicity , gastroenterology , urology , surgery , pharmacogenetics , biology , gene , genotype , biochemistry
Aims A previous study suggested that a thymine (THY) challenge dose could detect aberrant pharmacokinetics in known cases of fluoropyrimidine toxicity compared with healthy volunteers. The preliminary data suggested that urine sampling also could detect this aberrant disposition. The aim of this case–control study was to assess the ability of the urinary THY challenge test to discriminate cases of severe gastrointestinal toxicity in a cohort of patients treated with 5‐fluorouracil or capecitabine. Methods Patients ( n = 37) received a 250 mg ( per os ) dose of THY and a cumulative urine sample was collected for 0–4 h. The urinary amounts of THY and metabolite dihydrothymine (DHT) were determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Genomic DNA was analysed for DPYD gene variants. Renal function was estimated from blood creatinine levels. Cases ( n = 9) and noncases ( n = 23) of severe (grade ≥ 3) gastrointestinal toxicity were defined based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Results The median THY/DHT ratios were 6.2 (interquartile range 2.9–6.4) in cases, including the 2 patients who were DPYD heterozygous carriers. However, this was not significantly different ( P = .07) from the THY/DHT in noncases (median 2.6, interquartile range 2.8–4.2). Although creatinine clearance was lower ( P = .001) in cases, renal function could not discriminate cases from noncases. However, logistic regression analysis using both of these explanatory variables could discriminate most cases (receiver operating characteristic area 0.8792, 95% confidence interval 0.72–1.00). Conclusions The THY challenge test combined with a patient's renal function may be useful as a phenotypic diagnostic test to detect risk of life‐threatening fluoropyrimidine gastrointestinal toxicity.