Premium
Prescription patterns of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors for various indications: A UK population‐based study
Author(s) -
Mahmoudpour Seyed Hamidreza,
Asselbergs Folkert W.,
Souverein Patrick C.,
Boer Anthonius,
Maitlandvan der Zee Anke H.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1111/bcp.13692
Subject(s) - medicine , heart failure , myocardial infarction , angiotensin converting enzyme , medical prescription , population , retrospective cohort study , log rank test , angiotensin receptor blockers , cardiology , survival analysis , blood pressure , pharmacology , environmental health
Aim Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are widely prescribed for several cardiovascular indications. This study investigated patterns of ACEI use for various indications. Methods A descriptive, retrospective population‐based study was conducted using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients starting ACEIs (2007–2014) were selected and ACEI indications were retrieved from electronically recorded medical records. Stratified by indication, we distinguished between persistent and nonpersistent ACEI use, considering a 6‐month interval between two prescription periods as a maximum for persistent use. Five‐year persistence rates for various indications were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared in a log‐rank test. Nonpersistent users were subdivided into three groups: (i) stop; (ii) restart; and (iii) switch to an angiotensin II‐receptor blocker. Patients who received ACEIs for hypertension who switched to other classes of antihypertensive medications were further investigated. Results In total, 254 002 ACEI initiators were identified with hypertension (57.6%), myocardial infarction (MI; 4.2%), renal disease (RD; 3.7%), heart failure (HF; 1.5%), combinations of the above (17.2%) or none of the above (15.8%). Five‐year persistence rates ranged from 43.2% (RD) to 68.2% (MI; P < 0.0001). RD and HF patients used ACEIs for the shortest time (average 23.6 and 25.0 months, respectively). For the nonpersistent group, the percentage of switchers to angiotensin II‐receptor blockers ranged from 27.6% (RD) to 42.2% (MI) and the restarters ranged from 15.0% (HF) to 18.1% (group without indication). Conclusions Depending on the indication, there are various rates of ACEI nonpersistence. Patients with RD are most likely to discontinue treatment.