Twenty years of change in riverside vegetation: what role have invasive alien plants played?

Question Which environmental factors influence the occurrence of invasive alien plants ( IAP s) in riparian habitats, and how much can IAP s account for change in native vegetation compared with other environmental variables? Location Rivers distributed throughout mainland Britain. Methods We quantified change in river bank vegetation using survey data collected approximately 20 yr apart and assessed the contribution of major IAP s ( Impatiens glandulifera , Heracleum mantegazzianum and Fallopia japonica ) to these changes. We also determined the importance of abiotic factors such as flow regime and land use in driving these changes. Results Comparing data from pre‐ and post‐1990 surveys revealed that IAP s occurred mainly on lowland rivers (<200 m a.s.l.), regardless of time period, and their probability of occurrence increased over time and with rising frequency of high flows. Native plant species diversity declined over time with increasing IAP cover, along lowland rivers and along all rivers that experienced extended low flows during the growing season. These conditions particularly favoured native dominant species, whereas native subordinate species responded both positively and negatively to increased flood frequency depending on survey period. Over time, Salix spp. and larger native hydrophilic species, such as Sparganium erectum, increased along lowland rivers, replacing smaller‐statured ruderal species and driving a shift towards increased shade tolerance of subcanopy and groundcover species. Smaller compositional changes occurred in the uplands and these changes lacked a clear environmental signature. Conclusions National‐scale changes in native riparian vegetation are likely driven primarily by environmental changes and land‐use effects, rather than invasion by IAP s. However, IAP s, and indeed native species that benefit from abiotic changes, in turn, likely exert secondary effects on native riparian vegetation. The trend towards reduced diversity, increased shade tolerance and increased dominance of some native species and IAP s is likely linked to a set of interacting factors, including drier summers, wetter winters, increased riparian tree cover, reduced livestock access to river banks and increased fine sediment input. Determining combined effects of land use, IAP s and climate‐related changes in flow regime over decadal time scales (i.e. ~20 yr) is important for predicting ecological responses of vulnerable habitats under future disturbance scenarios.