Premium
Herbicide application as a habitat restoration tool: impact on native island plant communities
Author(s) -
KaiserBunbury Christopher N.,
Mougal James,
Valentin Terence,
Gabriel Ronny,
Blüthgen Nico
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
applied vegetation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.096
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1654-109X
pISSN - 1402-2001
DOI - 10.1111/avsc.12183
Subject(s) - ordination , biology , seedling , abundance (ecology) , plant community , habitat , native plant , altitude (triangle) , invasive species , introduced species , ecology , woody plant , agronomy , species richness , geometry , mathematics
Questions Which physical or chemical removal method is most effective in controlling woody invasive alien plant ( IAP ) species in sensitive conservation areas, while minimizing the impact on different life stages of native plant communities? Is there a distinct influence of removal method on successional trajectories of post‐treatment seedling communities? Location Mid‐altitude inselbergs, Mahé, Seychelles, Indian Ocean. Methods We conducted two field experiments. First, to test the effects of four IAP control methods (cut, 5%, 10%, 15% Tordon 101 herbicide concentration) on ten woody IAP species, we treated a total of 320 adults and monitored mortality for 18 wk. Second, we set up five blocks each with four plots (4 m × 4 m) at three inselberg sites ( N = 60 plots) and recorded the response of seedlings, saplings and adults of all native and IAP species to four Tordon 101 (a.i. picloram and 2,4‐D) herbicide and manual control treatments (cut, cut‐stump, foliar spray, control) over 22 mo. Treatment effects were analysed with GLMM models, and community responses were investigated with NMDS and multivariate ANOVA . Results The first experiment showed that IAP mortality (98.3%) was similar across all three herbicide concentrations, but markedly higher than mortality of cut plants (42.5%). In the second experiment, abundance, but not diversity, of native seedlings declined with herbicide application in the first 6 mo after treatment. Ordination analysis showed that seedling communities experienced high turnover driven by early successional IAP species and abundance, and that between‐plot variation was determined by site‐specific differences, with only a weak treatment effect. Foliar spray resulted in high mortality of native saplings (52.7%) and adults (18.3%), and both herbicide applications reduced adult growth over a post‐treatment period of 12 mo. Conclusion IAP removal controlled plant invasion processes and altered community composition in the short term, regardless of removal method. Post‐treatment trajectories of seedling communities are determined by site‐specific differences. Chemicals can strongly increase the efficacy of IAP control, but short‐term detrimental effects on native saplings and adults may be expected. As re‐invasion by IAP s is likely, a long‐term restoration plan is required. Management strategies that aim to conserve β‐diversity should employ a landscape approach to habitat restoration to buffer against site idiosyncrasies.