Premium
Identifying the trait syndromes of conservation indicator species: how distinct are B ritish ancient woodland indicator plants from other woodland species?
Author(s) -
Kimberley Adam,
Blackburn George A.,
Whyatt James D.,
Kirby Keith,
Smart Simon M.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
applied vegetation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.096
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1654-109X
pISSN - 1402-2001
DOI - 10.1111/avsc.12047
Subject(s) - woodland , biology , trait , habitat , ecology , perennial plant , biological dispersal , plant species , demography , population , sociology , computer science , programming language
Question Ancient woodland indicator species ( AWI s) are plant species which are thought to be restricted to areas of long‐continuity woodland habitat. In many cases, however, these species have been identified on the basis of personal, to some extent, subjective experience. Do the species proposed as AWI s according to these lists have traits in common, and how distinct is their trait profile from that of other woodland plant species? Location United K ingdom. Methods We applied classification tree analysis to a plant trait database to assess the extent to which proposed AWI species can be clearly separated from other woodland plants based upon their traits. We contrasted AWI species with an objectively defined list of plants that are not considered to be AWI s but that have been commonly recorded in woodlands. We also investigate the effects of phylogeny and region specificity on species' proposed AWI status. Results The results provide support for the distinctiveness of plant species thought to be associated with ancient woodland; they were found to be almost exclusively short, perennial species, usually with a high seed weight. Results also indicate that rarer AWI s have a more distinguishable trait profile than more common species. No link was found between phylogeny and AWI status. Conclusions AWI species do have a distinguishable trait profile, despite their often partially subjective selection. The results of the classification tree analysis suggest that traits reflecting poor dispersal ability may be partly responsible for confining these species to ancient woodlands. This confirms other studies that emphasize their low ability to colonize secondary woodland sites and hence vulnerability to habitat conversion.