Premium
Reforms to the Market for Audit and Assurance Services in the Period after the Global Financial Crisis: Evidence from the UK
Author(s) -
Kend Michael,
Basioudis IIias
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
australian accounting review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.551
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 1835-2561
pISSN - 1035-6908
DOI - 10.1111/auar.12211
Subject(s) - accounting , audit , joint audit , audit plan , business , directive , auditor independence , audit evidence , financial crisis , information technology audit , materiality (auditing) , chief audit executive , internal audit , economics , macroeconomics , philosophy , computer science , programming language , aesthetics
Abstract The global financial crisis (GFC) had little effect on audit practices in Australia, as the country was largely sheltered from the GFC. The UK and Europe, which had experienced significant reforms to audit, were not sheltered from the GFC and regulators and law makers were pressured to take further action. The key UK and European audit reforms included the expanded auditors' report, disclosures on materiality thresholds, restrictions on non‐audit services, more powers for audit committees and mandatory firm rotation by auditors. The aim of this exploratory research study is to obtain the views of relevant stakeholders in relation to the benefits and costs of the recent UK audit reforms and the new EU Audit Directive (July 2016), and via a synthesis of these results and a review of the relevant Australian accounting literature, consider whether there is scope for Australia to adopt similar reforms to audit services. The study finds that there are significant reforms to auditing that have benefited the UK audit profession, and an open debate in Australia needs to be considered regarding the need for similar reforms. The study suggests a need for a proactive approach to audit reform and this lends support to recent findings from Australian accounting research studies.