Premium
Religion and Revolution: Theorizing of the Arab Spring in Accordance With the Selectorate Approach
Author(s) -
Rabaia Ibrahim S. I.,
Tumin Makmor,
Yeoh Emile KokKheng
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
asian politics and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.193
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 1943-0787
pISSN - 1943-0779
DOI - 10.1111/aspp.12317
Subject(s) - politics , public good , perspective (graphical) , middle east , transition (genetics) , political economy , political philosophy , political science , distribution (mathematics) , spring (device) , economics , positive economics , sociology , neoclassical economics , law , mathematics , engineering , mathematical analysis , biochemistry , chemistry , geometry , gene , mechanical engineering
The selectorate theory introduces a framework to examine varying political structures, behavior, and systems with a fresh perspective. The theory proclaims that the political survival of a leader relies on a supportive coalition that continuously receives public and/or private payoffs. One revised revision of the selectorate theory elaborates on the classical selectorate model by investigating factors of political survival and regime stability in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and scrutinizing the elements of the recent MENA revolutions, such as the leaders’ religious preferences. This study demonstrates that the classical selectorate approach can perfectly satisfy the analysis of MENA transitions. We validated the revised model by showcasing the dynamics of political transition and confirming that selectorate expansion triggered a shift from private to public distribution of goods. Overall, our results were in support of the classical selectorate model and proclaimed religion as a public good, rather than a hindrance.