z-logo
Premium
The Post‐9/11 “Terrorism” Discourse and Its Impact on Nonstate Actors: A Comparative Study of the LTTE and H amas
Author(s) -
Toomey Michael,
Singleton Benedict E.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
asian politics and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.193
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 1943-0787
pISSN - 1943-0779
DOI - 10.1111/aspp.12110
Subject(s) - terrorism , legitimacy , adversary , politics , political science , state (computer science) , political economy , law , sociology , computer security , algorithm , computer science
In the aftermath of the 2001 W orld T rade C enter bombings, the application of the label “terrorist” to one of the parties in a given conflict can serve to deny political legitimacy, and can make possible the use of extreme measures to deal with them. This article compares the fortunes of the L iberation T igers of T amil E elam and H amas. Through the use of an analysis of contemporary discourses relating to terrorism, it is argued that, in the post‐9/11 world, successfully ascribing a nonstate opponent as a terrorist permits the use of overwhelming force. The discourse thus becomes a powerful political technology in the hands of state actors, regardless of the justification for its use.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here