z-logo
Premium
Genetic relationship of litter traits between farrowing and weaning in Landrace and Large White pigs
Author(s) -
Ogawa Shinichiro,
Konta Ayane,
Kimata Makoto,
Ishii Kazuo,
Uemoto Yoshinobu,
Satoh Masahiro
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
animal science journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.606
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1740-0929
pISSN - 1344-3941
DOI - 10.1111/asj.13304
Subject(s) - litter , heritability , weaning , large white , zoology , genetic correlation , biology , trait , birth weight , white (mutation) , veterinary medicine , genetic variation , medicine , genetics , pregnancy , gene , ecology , computer science , programming language
Abstract We estimated genetic parameters in Landrace and Large White pig populations for litter traits at farrowing (total number born, number born alive, number stillborn, total litter weight at birth (LWB), and mean litter weight at birth) and those at weaning (litter size at weaning (LSW), total litter weight at weaning (LWW), mean litter weight at weaning (MWW), and survival rate from farrowing to weaning). We analyzed 65,579 records at farrowing and 6,306 at weaning for Landrace, and 52,557 and 5,360, respectively, for Large White. Single‐trait and two‐trait repeatability animal models were exploited to estimate heritability and genetic correlation respectively. Heritability estimates of LSW were 0.09 for Landrace and 0.08 for Large White. Genetic correlations of LSW with MWW were –0.43 for Landrace and –0.24 for Large White. Genetic correlations of LSW with LWW and LWB ranged from 0.5 to 0.6. The genetic correlation of MWW with LWW was positive, but that with LWB was negligible. The results indicate that utilizing LWW or LWB could improve LSW efficiently, despite the antagonistic genetic correlation between LSW and MWW.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here