z-logo
Premium
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopy‐assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants and small children weighing less than 10 kg: A comparison with larger patients
Author(s) -
Zenitani Masahiro,
Nose Satoko,
Sasaki Takashi,
Oue Takaharu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
asian journal of endoscopic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.372
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 1758-5910
pISSN - 1758-5902
DOI - 10.1111/ases.12803
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , laparoscopy , gastrostomy , percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy , exsufflation , medical record , gastropexy , percutaneous , insufflation , stomach , finance , peg ratio , economics
Laparoscopy‐assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (LAPEG) can reduce the risk of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy‐related complications, such as intra‐abdominal organ injury, and determine the optimal position for placement of the gastrostomy tube. We first employed LAPEG 10 years ago but limited its application to elderly patients. Indications for LAPEG have now expanded to small children. This retrospective study aimed to determine the feasibility of LAPEG in children weighing <10 kg. Methods Our LAPEG procedure for small children involves three essential techniques: gastric insufflation with CO 2 to prevent intestinal dilation, a T‐fastener device to overcome the difficulties of gastropexy, and primary placement of a button gastrostomy to create less torque than tube gastrostomy at the insertion site and to prevent early tube dislodgement. The medical records of 48 patients with physical and mental disabilities who underwent LAPEG between 2010 and 2018 were evaluated. The outcomes of LAPEG in patients weighing <10 kg (group A, n=11) and ≥10 kg (group B, n=37) were compared. Results The LAPEG procedure was completed in all cases without intraoperative complications or open conversion. The median bodyweight of group A was 6.3 kg (range, 3.6‐8.2 kg). None of the patients in group A developed postoperative complications such as stomal infection or dislodgement. The operative time was significantly shorter in group A than in group B ( P  < .05). Conclusion By improving surgical techniques for small children, our LAPEG procedure might be feasible and safe for treating children weighing <10 kg, including those weighing as little as 3.6 kg.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here