Premium
Trusting Communities and Bigger In‐Groups: Social Capital, Interracial Contact Climate, and Common In‐Group Categorization
Author(s) -
Fisher Emily L.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
analyses of social issues and public policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.479
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 1530-2415
pISSN - 1529-7489
DOI - 10.1111/asap.12043
Subject(s) - social capital , categorization , social psychology , reciprocity (cultural anthropology) , contact hypothesis , social identity theory , prejudice (legal term) , psychology , mediation , social group , sociology , social science , philosophy , epistemology
Contact with members of different groups can reduce prejudice and encourage people to recategorize members of other social categories. This research examines individual‐level social capital—one's experience with trust, reciprocity norms, and engagement within a given community—as a construct that predicts contact climate and recategorization. People who have high levels of social capital within a community are more likely to perceive a positive interracial contact climate. High social capital and a favorable contact climate can encourage people to focus on their shared identity as members of that community. Two studies support the claim that social capital predicts intergroup processes. Study 1 tests a cross‐sectional mediation model linking individual‐level social capital to perceptions of the contact climate, common in‐group categorization, and racial out‐group attitudes. Study 2 presents longitudinal data demonstrating that social capital's cross‐lagged effects on contact climate, categorization, and racial out‐group attitudes are stronger than their reverse effects. Implications for diversity research and community applications are discussed.