Premium
Evaluating the optimum number of biopsies to assess histological inflammation in ulcerative colitis: a retrospective cohort study
Author(s) -
Battat Robert,
Vande Casteele Niels,
Pai Rish K.,
Wang Zhongya,
Zou Guangyong,
McDonald John W. D.,
Duijvestein Marjolijn,
Jeyarajah Jenny,
Parker Claire E.,
Van Viegen Tanja,
Nelson Sigrid A.,
Boland Brigid S.,
Singh Siddharth,
Dulai Parambir S.,
Valasek Mark A.,
Feagan Brian G.,
Jairath Vipul,
Sandborn William J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/apt.16083
Subject(s) - medicine , biopsy , ulcerative colitis , histopathology , confidence interval , sampling (signal processing) , gastroenterology , prospective cohort study , radiology , pathology , disease , filter (signal processing) , computer science , computer vision
Summary Background The optimal ulcerative colitis biopsy protocol is unclear. Aim To evaluate the number of biopsies required to accurately assess microscopic disease activity in ulcerative colitis Methods Biopsies from patients with ≥4 rectosigmoid samples, and clinical and endoscopic data, were retrospectively obtained from a prospective biobank. Histology and endoscopic videos were read blindly. A 4‐biopsy Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) reference score, consisting of the worst item‐level ratings from four biopsies, was compared to 1‐, 2‐ and 3‐biopsy estimates. Agreement was determined using bivariate errors‐in‐variable regression analysis (acceptance interval: ±8.25). Endoscopic activity and disease location subgroup analyses were also performed. Results Forty‐six patients had ≥4 rectosigmoid biopsies available (N = 287). The 2‐biopsy (tolerance interval: −7.66, 4.79) and 3‐biopsy (tolerance interval: −4.86, 3.46) RHI scores demonstrated acceptable agreement with 4‐biopsy scores. One‐biopsy scores demonstrated unacceptable agreement (tolerance interval: −13.99, 7.78). Mean RHI scores using the 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐biopsy approaches were similar (6.1 ± 9.6 P = 0.36; 6.8 ± 10.5, P = 0.7; 7.5 ± 11.2), whereas the 1‐biopsy estimate was lower (4.4 ± 8.1, P = 0.06). Histological remission rates were identical for the 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐biopsy methods (65.2%, P = 1.0). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that three biopsies were required in patients with endoscopically active disease. Sampling additional colonic locations yielded lower histological remission rates compared to rectosigmoid sampling alone (33.3% vs 61.9%, P = 0.1). Conclusions A minimum of two — conservatively, three — biopsies are required to reliably assess disease activity in a single colonic segment using the RHI. Further studies are needed of endoscopically active patients and sampling locations. These results have implications for biopsy strategies in clinical trials and practice.