Premium
Sequential systemic treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Author(s) -
Kirstein Martha M.,
Scheiner Bernhard,
Marwede Tristan,
Wolf Caroline,
Voigtländer Torsten,
Semmler Georg,
Wacker Frank,
Manns Michael P.,
Hinrichs Jan B.,
Pinter Matthias,
Vogel Arndt
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/apt.15789
Subject(s) - medicine , lenvatinib , cabozantinib , systemic therapy , regorafenib , ramucirumab , hepatocellular carcinoma , nivolumab , sorafenib , liver function , gastroenterology , surgery , cancer , immunotherapy , colorectal cancer , breast cancer
Summary Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most lethal cancers. After many years of stagnation, there are now several systemic treatments available for patients with HCC. Aim To analyse the feasibility and efficacy of sequential systemic treatments in patients with HCC in clinical practice. Methods In this multicentre study, patients who were treated with novel systemic therapies for HCC between 2014 and 2019 at two referral centres, Hannover Medical School, Germany, and Medical University of Vienna, Austria, were included. Results Overall, 85 patients were included of which 76 patients (89.4%) received more than one and a maximum of five systemic treatment lines. The most common therapy sequence was sorafenib (n = 72; 84.7%) followed by regorafenib (n = 37; 48.7%), whereas 11 patients were initially treated with lenvatinib (12.9%). Other second‐line treatments included pembrolizumab, nivolumab, cabozantinib and ramucirumab. Hepatic function deteriorated during sequential systemic treatment in 48.6% of the patients as defined by an increase in at least one Child‐Pugh point. Median overall survival (mOS) from the start of first systemic treatment was 35 months for patients with sequential systemic treatment compared to 9 months for patients with one systemic treatment line ( P < 0.001). Patients previously treated with surgical/locoregional therapies had a longer mOS compared to patients with initial systemic treatment (66 vs 25 months; P = 0.020). Conclusions Sequential systemic treatment is feasible and effective in selected patients with HCC in clinical practice. Our study underlines the critical importance of well‐preserved liver function for successful administration of sequential systemic therapy.