z-logo
Premium
Systematic review with meta‐analysis: efficacy and safety of oral Janus kinase inhibitors for inflammatory bowel disease
Author(s) -
Ma Christopher,
Lee Jeffrey K.,
Mitra Anish R.,
Teriaky Anouar,
Choudhary Daksh,
Nguyen Tran M.,
Vande Casteele Niels,
Khanna Reena,
Panaccione Remo,
Feagan Brian G.,
Jairath Vipul
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/apt.15297
Subject(s) - medicine , placebo , tofacitinib , gastroenterology , inflammatory bowel disease , relative risk , ulcerative colitis , adverse effect , janus kinase , confidence interval , disease , cytokine , pathology , rheumatoid arthritis , alternative medicine
Summary Background Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors represent a novel therapeutic class for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Aims To determine the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors compared to placebo for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL were systematically searched to November 1, 2018. Randomised placebo‐controlled trials (RCTs) of JAK inhibitors in adult patients with CD or UC were eligible. Open‐label extension studies without a placebo comparator arm were excluded. Clinical, endoscopic, and safety outcomes were extracted and rates relative to placebo were pooled using a random‐effects model. Results A total of 12 RCTs (5 CD, 7 UC) were included. Patients were randomised to placebo (n = 844), tofacitinib (n = 1882), filgotinib (n = 130), peficitinib (n = 176), upadacitinib (n = 387) or TD‐1473 (n = 31). JAK inhibitor treatment was associated with induction of clinical remission in CD (RR, relative risk 1.38 [95% confidence interval CI 1.04‐1.83], P  = 0.025, I 2  = 14%) and UC (RR 3.07 [95% CI 2.03‐4.63], P  < 0.001, I 2  = 0%). In UC, JAK inhibitor treatment was associated with induction of endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo subscore MCSe = 0/1) (RR 2.43 [95% CI 1.64‐3.59], P  < 0.001, I 2  = 27%) and mucosal healing (MCSe = 0) (RR 5.50 [95% CI 2.46‐12.32], P  < 0.001, I 2  = 0%). JAK inhibitor treatment increased the risk of infection compared to placebo (RR 1.40 [95% CI 1.18‐1.67], P  < 0.001, I 2  = 0%), particularly for herpes zoster. Conclusions JAK inhibitors are effective for inducing clinical remission in CD and induction of clinical and endoscopic remission in UC, although are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here