Premium
Inequity of care provision and outcome disparity in autoimmune hepatitis in the United Kingdom
Author(s) -
Dyson Jessica K.,
Wong Lin Lee,
Bigirumurame Theophile,
Hirschfield Gideon M.,
Kendrick Stuart,
Oo Ye H.,
Lohse Ansgar W,
Heneghan Michael A.,
Jones David E. J.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/apt.14968
Subject(s) - medicine , autoimmune hepatitis , prednisolone , hepatitis , cohort , hepatitis c , cirrhosis , pediatrics
Summary Background Treatment paradigms in autoimmune hepatitis ( AIH ) have remained largely unchanged for decades. Studies report ≤20% of patients have sub‐optimal treatment response with most requiring long‐term therapy. Aim The United Kingdom Autoimmune Hepatitis ( UK ‐ AIH ) study was established to evaluate current treatment practice and outcomes, determine the unmet needs of patients, and develop and implement improved treatment approaches. Methods The United Kingdom Autoimmune Hepatitis study is a cross‐sectional cohort study examining secondary care management of prevalent adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Enrolment began in March 2014. Prevalent cases were defined as having been diagnosed and treated for >1 year. Demographic data, biochemistry, treatment history and response, and care location were collected. Results In total, 1249 patients were recruited; 635 were cared for in transplant units and 614 in non‐transplant centres (81% female with median age at diagnosis 50 years). Overall, 29 treatment regimens were reported and biochemical remission rate was 59%. Remission rates were significantly higher in transplant compared to non‐transplant centres (62 vs 55%, P = 0.028). 55% have ongoing corticosteroid exposure; 9% are receiving prednisolone monotherapy. Those aged ≤20 years at diagnosis were more likely to develop cirrhosis and place of care was associated with an aggressive disease phenotype. Conclusions There are significant discrepancies in the care received by patients with autoimmune hepatitis in the UK. A high proportion remains on corticosteroids and there is significant treatment variability. Patients receiving care in transplant centres were more likely to achieve and maintain remission. Overall poor remission rates suggest that there are significant unmet therapeutic needs for patients with autoimmune hepatitis.