Premium
Using the chronic kidney disease guidelines to evaluate the renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in hepatitis B patients
Author(s) -
Tsai H. J.,
Chuang Y. W.,
Lee S. W.,
Wu C. Y.,
Yeh H. Z.,
Lee T. Y.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/apt.14682
Subject(s) - medicine , renal function , hazard ratio , kidney disease , entecavir , gastroenterology , confidence interval , cumulative incidence , incidence (geometry) , urology , chronic hepatitis , lamivudine , immunology , cohort , virus , physics , optics
Summary Background Renal dysfunction remains an issue in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Aim To evaluate renal safety of TDF according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. Methods We retrospectively recruited CHB patients who received either TDF or entecavir (ETV) monotherapy from January 2008 to August 2015. After excluding confounding conditions, 253 patients who received TDF were randomly matched 1:2 with 506 patients who received ETV through the propensity scores, which consisted of age, gender, cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Renal function deterioration was defined as a drop in GFR category accompanied with a ≥25% eGFR decline. Cumulative incidences of and hazard ratios (HRs) for renal dysfunction were analysed. Results The mean eGFR decline was significantly greater in the TDF group over 48 months (TDF vs ETV: 15.73 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.76‐17.70 vs 5.96 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% CI: 4.72‐7.19; P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of renal function deterioration was significantly higher in the TDF group (TDF vs ETV: 11.1%, 95% CI: 7.4‐14.8 vs 1.7%, 95% CI: 1.0‐2.4; P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, pre‐existing CKD and diabetes, TDF was independently associated with an increased risk of renal function deterioration (HR 5.36, 95% CI: 2.16‐13.35; P < 0.001). Pre‐existing CKD (HR 6.71, 95% CI: 2.25‐17.65), proteinuria (HR 3.39, 95% CI: 1.23‐9.39), and haematuria (HR 4.25, 95% CI: 1.32‐13.68) were also independent factors of renal dysfunction. Conclusion By following the KDIGO guidelines, we confirmed that TDF was associated with a higher risk of renal dysfunction as compared to ETV.