Premium
Review article: the gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease—avenues for microbial management
Author(s) -
McIlroy J.,
Ianiro G.,
Mukhopadhya I.,
Hansen R.,
Hold G. L.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/apt.14384
Subject(s) - microbiome , inflammatory bowel disease , ulcerative colitis , disease , medicine , gut flora , crohn's disease , metagenomics , gut microbiome , inflammatory bowel diseases , human microbiome , human microbiome project , fecal bacteriotherapy , intensive care medicine , bioinformatics , immunology , biology , antibiotics , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry , gene , clostridium difficile
Summary Background The concept of an altered collective gut microbiota rather than identification of a single culprit is possibly the most significant development in inflammatory bowel disease research. We have entered the “omics” era, which now allows us to undertake large‐scale/high‐throughput microbiota analysis which may well define how we approach diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease ( IBD ) in the future, with a strong steer towards personalised therapeutics. Aim To assess current epidemiological, experimental and clinical evidence of the current status of knowledge relating to the gut microbiome, and its role in IBD , with emphasis on reviewing the evidence relating to microbial therapeutics and future microbiome modulating therapeutics. Methods A Medline search including items ‘intestinal microbiota/microbiome’, ‘inflammatory bowel disease’, ‘ulcerative colitis’, ‘Crohn's disease’, ‘faecal microbial transplantation’, ‘dietary manipulation’ was performed. Results Disease remission and relapse are associated with microbial changes in both mucosal and luminal samples. In particular, a loss of species richness in Crohn's disease has been widely observed. Existing therapeutic approaches broadly fall into 3 categories, namely: accession, reduction or indirect modulation of the microbiome. In terms of microbial therapeutics, faecal microbial transplantation appears to hold the most promise; however, differences in study design/methodology mean it is currently challenging to elegantly translate results into clinical practice. Conclusions Existing approaches to modulate the gut microbiome are relatively unrefined. Looking forward, the future of microbiome‐modulating therapeutics looks bright with several novel strategies/technologies on the horizon. Taken collectively, it is clear that ignoring the microbiome in IBD is not an option.